[DV_listserv] DV/Restitution Case

Domestic Violence issues dv_listserv at listsmart.osl.state.or.us
Fri Nov 14 09:34:54 PST 2014


Great case! It illustrates how we should think expansively about what qualifies as an "economic damage" and really work at trying to obtain this restitution for the victims in our cases.



State v. Pumphrey

Date Filed: 11-05-2014
Case #: A153140
Hadlock, J. for the Court; Sercombe, P.J.; & Tookey, J.
Full Text Opinion: http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A153140.pdf

CRIMINAL LAW: Under ORS 137.106, a Defendant must pay restitution for economic damages incurred by violating a stalking protective order so long as there is a "but for" causal relationship between the criminal activity and the resulting the economic damages.

In 2010, the victim obtained the stalking protective order prohibiting Defendant from contacting, coming into visual presence of, or waiting outside work for the victim. In 2012, Defendant breached the SPO. Nearly a week later, the victim sought medical attention for "massive panic attacks" resulting in multiple physician visits and medicating treatment. The victim missed work for the doctor's appointments; attended group therapy and counseling; obtained police reports from other jurisdictions; rented a temporary residence; changed her phone number; and changed the locks on her front door. Defendant appealed a judgment requiring payment of $2,674.76 in restitution for victim's economic damages resulting from Defendant's two convicted counts of violation of a SPO.  Defendant argued that there was insufficient evidence to show that the five items of restitution were "economic damages."  The trial court held that all of these expenditures were incurred as a result of Defendant's violation of the SPO. Defendant argued on appeal that there was no direct connection between the expenditures and the harm.  The Court found that all of the economic damages resulted from the Defendant's criminal activities, stemming from the victim's state of fear induced by Defendant's violation of the SPO.  Affirmed.

[Summarized by: Gabriel Lee]



*****CONFIDENTIALITY  NOTICE*****

This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee or it appears from the context or otherwise that you have received this e-mail in error, please advise me immediately by reply e-mail, keep the contents confidential, and immediately delete the message and any attachments from your system. 

************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://omls.oregon.gov/pipermail/dv_listserv/attachments/20141114/c5ce6a1d/attachment.html>


More information about the DV_listserv mailing list