From Nicole.M.BRAZEAL at oregon.gov Thu Mar 26 10:08:08 2015 From: Nicole.M.BRAZEAL at oregon.gov (BRAZEAL Nicole M * DAS) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:08:08 +0000 Subject: [Oac-link] Feedback Request re: Required Fields on ORS190 Message-ID: <19D51BE3352A1742B52BC0258AB4B0749758EBC3@WPORGEXCL06.ENTSS.OR.GOV> Hi OAC's, We recently discovered that on ORS190 documents the Secondary Organization's address and Secondary Organization's contact are not required fields. They can be skipped and the integrity check will not catch them, so it will allow the document to be issued without this information. Our question is: should these two fields be set to "Required"? We believe it should and the feedback we've received from within DAS is yes, but we wanted to present the question to the whole OAC group. Let me know your thoughts! [cid:image001.jpg at 01D067AC.C116B0F0] Thank you, [cid:image002.jpg at 01D067AC.C116B0F0] Nicole Brazeal, OPMA ORPIN System Administrator 503-378-5858 http://procurement.oregon.gov Data Classification Level 2 - Limited -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 59850 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 4657 bytes Desc: image002.jpg URL: